15 September 2025
Moon Township Board of Supervisors and its boards · 25 subject tags
The Board of Supervisors held a special meeting on September 15, 2025, convening at 6:00 p.m. with the chairman and three supervisors present; one supervisor was absent. The board first announced an executive session held after the September 3 regular meeting to discuss litigation. The sole agenda item was a continued public hearing on the conditional use application filed by Revival Today, Inc. for a place of worship at 1442 Coraopolis Heights Road. The solicitor oversaw the hearing. An attorney representing the applicant entered exhibits 65 through 72, including a calendar of proposed activities and attendance numbers. The attorney stated the applicant was not willing to commit to the residential noise standard in the ordinance but acknowledged the board could attach reasonable conditions. Several residents testified about noise and vibration disturbances since June 2024. An attorney representing 13 nearby homeowners presented witnesses and sought to introduce video clips of the applicant's pastor. After a recess for attorneys to review the clips, the solicitor allowed the six-minute video into evidence over the applicant's attorney's objection, ruling it relevant to the issue of the applicant’s intent to be a good neighbor. The hearing was continued to October 28, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. to allow a resident to present testimony. The motion to continue passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m.The Board of Supervisors held a special meeting on September 15, 2025, convening at 6:00 p.m. with the chairman and three supervisors present; one supervisor was absent. The board first announced an executive session held after the September 3 regular meeting to discuss litigation. The sole agenda item was a continued public hearing on the conditional use application filed by Revival Today, Inc. for a place of worship at 1442 Coraopolis Heights Road. The solicitor oversaw the hearing. An attorney representing the applicant entered exhibits 65 through 72, including a calendar of proposed activities and attendance numbers. The attorney stated the applicant was not willing to commit to the residential noise standard in the ordinance but acknowledged the board could attach reasonable conditions. Several residents testified about noise and vibration disturbances since June 2024. An attorney representing 13 nearby homeowners presented witnesses and sought to introduce video clips of the applicant's pastor. After a recess for attorneys to review the clips, the solicitor allowed the six-minute video into evidence over the applicant's attorney's objection, ruling it relevant to the issue of the applicant’s intent to be a good neighbor. The hearing was continued to October 28, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. to allow a resident to present testimony. The motion to continue passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
Summarised by AI from the linked minutes, with some details withheld for privacy. The document is the record — check anything that matters against it.